Dominic Stricker vs Emilio Nava Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 25 Jun at 12:11 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Stricker vs E. Nava

SUI
2
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Stricker 2 - 0 Nava
They have played 5 sets in total, with Dominic Stricker winning 4 and Emilio Nava winning 1. The last match between Dominic Stricker and Emilio Nava was at the Wimbledon - London, 25-06-2025, Round: Q2, Surface: Grass, with Dominic Stricker getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Stricker | 2 |
| Nava | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(Q2) Wimbledon - London(06-25-25)
(R2) Cleveland Challenger(02-02-22)
D. Stricker vs E. Nava H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $620,225 | Career Prize Money | $696,545 |
| 55.78% (140-111) | Career Total W/L | 59.80% (244-164) |
| 1 | Grass | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 5 | Titles | 7 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 14.29% (1-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.00% (6-6) |
D. Stricker vs E. Nava Match Preview:
- Nava has a slight edge with second serve points, securing 46.65% compared to Stricker's 44.34%.
- In return games, Nava also shows strength by winning 47.26% of opponent's second serve points versus Stricker's 44.23%.
- For first serve returns, Stricker slightly outperforms with 26% compared to Nava's 24.74%.
- Under pressure, Nava has a better breakpoint save rate of 53.39%, while Stricker stands at 48.21%.
- Nava boasts a higher match-winning percentage over the last year at 61.18%, compared to Stricker's 50.98%.
- Analyzing surface preferences, Nava excels on Clay with a 67% win rate, whereas Stricker's best results come on Indoor Hard with a 60% win rate.
- Stricker has the upper hand in direct Head-to-Head encounters, having won their only previous match against Nava.
- In deciding sets overall, Stricker leads with a 55% win rate, slightly better than Nava’s 52%.
- Regarding breakpoint conversion, Nava performs better at 34.85% compared to Stricker’s 29.55%.
- Stricker has faced higher-ranking opponents with an average rank of 245.45 compared to Nava's average of 261.74.
Editorial Prediction (June 25, 2025, UTC):
As we approach the upcoming match, Nava demonstrates superior recent form in several key areas, including second serve points won and breakpoint conversion. These factors are critical in maintaining control of games.
Stricker, however, shines in head-to-head matchups, having won the only previous encounter and demonstrating a steady performance on Indoor Hard surfaces, where he has his best career statistics.
Nava's higher match win percentage over the last year and ability to perform under pressure with a better breakpoint save rate suggests he has the potential to handle tense moments well.
Despite Nava's slightly favorable statistics, Stricker's head-to-head advantage and performance on Indoor Hard courts tip the scales. Considering these factors, Stricker is more likely to secure a win in this upcoming match.
Dominic Stricker vs Emilio Nava Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. Stricker vs E. Nava H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 28 | Games Won | 23 |
| 11 | Aces (Total) | 14 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:30:19 | Average Match Time | 1:30:19 |
| 63% (100/160) | 1st Serve % | 65% (83/127) |
| 81% (81/100) | 1st Serve Win % | 80% (66/83) |
| 53% (32/60) | 2nd Serve Win % | 66% (29/44) |
| 50% (3/6) | Break Pts Won % | 20% (1/5) |
| 25% (32/127) | Return Points Win % | 29% (47/160) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
D. Stricker Recent Matches Played
E. Nava Recent Matches Played

D. Stricker vs E. Nava Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.78% (140/111) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.80% (244/164) |
| 54.41% (333/279) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.74% (543/414) |
| 51.27% (3045/2894) | Games Win/Loss | 51.87% (4866/4515) |
| 45.95% (17/20) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.43% (97/78) |
| 53.52% (38/33) | Clay Win/Loss | 67.06% (114/56) |
| 60.53% (69/45) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54.90% (28/23) |
| 55.17% (16/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 41.67% (5/7) |
| 0.63 | Aces Per Game | 0.54 |
| 1840 | Aces Total | 2501 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 756 | Total Double Faults | 1172 |
| 1:35:42 | Average Match Time | 1:37:21 |
| 351.14 | Average Opponent Rank | 371.4 |
| 57% (10117/17882) | 1st Serve % | 63% (17733/28359) |
| 75% (7541/10117) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (12657/17733) |
| 52% (3999/7765) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5440/10626) |
| 39% (619/1591) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1036/2507) |
| 37% (6867/18487) | Return Points Win % | 38% (10728/28419) |
| 57.58% (19/14) | Slam W/L | 51.85% (14/13) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 50.00% (14/14) |
| 0.00% (0/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 49.02% (25/26) | Main Tour W/L | 42.31% (11/15) |
| 56.67% (68/52) | Challenger W/L | 62.06% (157/96) |
| 65.12% (28/15) | Futures W/L | 64.86% (48/26) |
| 58% (128/222) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (238/396) |
| 50% (10/20) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (4/10) |
| 55% (66/121) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (87/174) |
| 55% (48/87) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (77/130) |
| 83% (135/112) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (232/199) |
| 14% (135/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (232/33) |
| 24% (116/28) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (176/44) |